About Runta

Runta builds runtime infrastructure that lets AI agents execute reliably over long time horizons: run agents efficiently, govern what they can reach, and record what they did. Workloads that run for hours or days break the assumptions web infrastructure is built on. An agent can fan out fifty sub-tasks in a second and then go idle for ten minutes, must survive instance recycling mid-run, and needs to snapshot, resume, and branch its execution state the way developers branch code. We’re building the substrate that makes this possible.

We’re a small, well-funded team, moving fast.

The Role

Our runtime team builds the engine. Our infrastructure team makes it scale. You decide what it feels like to use.

Runta does three things: run, govern, record. Underneath, that’s microVMs, snapshot graphs, and audit machinery. Your job is to make sure developers never have to think about any of that. They should think “I can pause my agent, branch it into three versions, and resume the best one,” and the SDK, CLI, docs, and examples you build are what makes that thought possible.

This role decides whether Runta is an impressive piece of infrastructure or a platform people build on. Powerful primitives with a bad interface lose to weaker primitives with a great one. You own the interface.

You’ll be the developer-zero for every capability the runtime team ships: the first person to use it, the person who decides what gets exposed and what stays hidden, and the person who makes the 5-minute quickstart actually take 5 minutes.

What You’ll Do

Design and build Runta’s SDK and CLI: the primary surface through which developers run, snapshot, branch, and replay agents
Make API design decisions with long consequences: what to expose, what to hide, what to name things
Build the examples, quickstarts, and reference docs that take a developer from curiosity to a running agent
Turn runtime capabilities into product language: translating “microVM snapshot semantics” into things agent builders immediately want
Feel every rough edge first and fix it: error messages, failure modes, onboarding friction
Represent the developer inside the company: your feedback shapes what the runtime team builds next

The Problems You’d Be Solving

Branching a running agent is a new primitive with no established mental model. What’s the API shape, and what metaphor makes it click in 10 seconds?
A resume fails three days after the snapshot was taken. What error message does the developer see, and what can they do about it?
The runtime exposes 40 knobs. Which 5 belong in the quickstart, which 35 belong behind an escape hatch, and how do you keep the escape hatch from becoming the front door?
A developer’s first 5 minutes decide whether they come back. What does the ideal zero-to-running-agent path look like, and what’s currently in its way?

If you read those and started sketching answers, we want to talk to you.

What We’re Looking For

You’ve built developer-facing product surfaces: an SDK, a CLI, a public API, or a devtools product people chose to use
Exceptional API taste, with opinions you can defend about what to expose, what to hide, and what to name things
You write clearly. Docs, examples, and error messages are product surfaces here, not chores
You can read the systems underneath: you don’t need to build a hypervisor, but you need to understand what one is, so your abstractions don’t lie
You genuinely enjoy solving user problems and get satisfaction from someone else’s “oh, that was easy”

Nice to have: open source maintainership with a reputation for good DX, developer advocacy or technical writing experience, experience building with AI agents or LLM APIs.

You Should Genuinely Care About AI

The developers you serve are agent builders. If you’re one yourself, you’ll know what they need before they file the issue. The best fit is someone who uses AI tools daily, has built things with agents on their own time, and has opinions about why today’s agent frameworks are frustrating.

This Role Is Probably Not for You If

Your product experience is primarily end-user web or mobile apps, and developer tools would be a career change rather than a return to form
You need a PM to hand you specs. Here you’d write them
You see documentation and error messages as someone else’s job

How We Work

Small team, high trust, high ownership. We value people who are hungry, humble, and sharp. We look for clear communicators who hold strong opinions loosely and use AI-native workflows in their daily engineering. You’ll work directly with the founder, alongside the core runtime and cloud infrastructure teams.

Compensation

$150k–$200k base, meaningful early-stage equity, standard benefits. Mid-level; calibrated to experience.

Member of Technical Staff - Product Engineering